Search our website Find job opportunies at THI and St. Luke's Find a doctor location and contact information
Heart Information Center
Ask a Heart Doctor
  Back to previous page


Help us improve this service.

Your feedback will help guide us in developing this site.

Ask a Texas Heart Institute Doctor 
Informed patients make better patients.


For a bicuspid aortic valve, is minimally invasive AVR or conventional AVR better?

I am 34 yrs old, good health and I have been diagnosed with a bicuspid aortic valve fusion that has a prolapse of RCC in diastole. Is it possible to perform a minimally invasive aortic valve replacement based on my condition or is the only option to get the regular, down the middle open heart surgery? Just wondering what my potential options are based on the limited info given.

submitted by Jeremy from San Antonio, Texas on 7/3/2014


by Texas Heart Institute cardiovascular surgeon, Denton A. Cooley, MD  

Denton A. Cooley, MD, FACS, FACC, FCCPEither technique is good.  In my opinion, the choice ideally belongs to your surgeon who should explain why one approach may be better than another for you, based on his/her understanding of your history, symptoms and clinical findings.  Perhaps nothing needs to be done yet, given your young age.  Please discuss these topics with your physicians.

See also on this site:

Has your question or a similar one already been answered?
Search all the Heart Doctor questions and answers.

To search for a doctor or access St. Luke's physician referral service, use the "Find a Doctor" link at the top of this page.

Updated July 2014
Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Subscribe to us on YouTube Find Us on Flicikr Follow Us on Pinterest Add us on Google+ Find us on LinkedIn 

Please contact our Webmaster with questions or comments.
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
© Copyright Texas Heart Institute
All rights reserved.